This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

The existence of a potentially habitable planet  orbiting our closest neighbor, the cherry-red dwarf Proxima Centauri, is both an extremely exciting upshot and sort of "more of the same." While Proxima b is simply i exoplanet among thousands, it'due south the closest extrasolar planet nosotros've found so far. We don't yet know if the planet is rocky or even has an atmosphere, just its mass and location imply the former. Its existence in the Goldilocks zone of its red dwarf, meanwhile, offers the tantalizing possibility of h2o.

There are significant questions about whether or non planets inside the habitable zone of a red dwarf would actually exist habitable. These planets orbit then close to their parent stars that they may go tidally locked, meaning i side of the planet always faces the star. It'southward possible that Proxima b has a 3:2 resonance orbit like to Mercury, which would mean it rotates iii times for every 2 revolutions around the star – merely too, like on Mercury, it would mean that there was a major thermal differential betwixt the mean solar day side and the night side. There are also questions about whether or not a planet in orbit around a flare star (a star prone to dramatic increases in brightness in a short fourth dimension) can sustain life – and the cosmic environs surrounding immature red dwarf stars is no picnic, either. Only for the sake of our example, let's assume Proxima b is habitable and that we want to get in that location. Can we?

Probably non with conventional chemical rockets, is the brusk, unsatisfying reply. The trouble with chemic rockets is that they rely on huge amounts of propellant. The Saturn V may accept taken us to the Moon, and NASA's SLS may one mean solar day reach Mars, simply chemic rockets cannot accomplish other solar systems on homo timescales. The problem is simple: The faster you desire to become, the more propellant you lot demand. The more propellant you demand, the greater the mass of the rocket. The larger the rocket, the more than propellant you need. Fuel and mass limits snowball like this. 90% of the weight of the space shuttle was its fuel, and it'southward been estimated that you'd need more chemical rocket fuel than there are atoms in the universe to complete a trip to Blastoff or Proxima Centauri at any meaningful per centum of the speed of low-cal.

Ion thruster engineering science, which uses a very low level of thrust produced over very long time periods, is theoretically capable of sending a mission payload to another star system without requiring a universe worth of chemic fuel — simply not within a sane menses of fourth dimension. The Infinite Shuttle would've taken roughly 165,000 years to reach Proxima Centauri; our current level of ion drive technology could perform the same feat in almost half the time, or about 81,000 years.

Truly theoretical concepts for space flying, like the Alcubierre warp drive or the EMDrive NASA is studying that may or may not be at all, aren't much more help here, because these technologies fundamentally rely on breakthroughs we aren't even close to making. Project Starshot, a recently appear initiative to accelerate tiny iPhone-sized satellites to a meaning fraction of the speed of light, could possibly send a probe to Proxima Centauri within a human lifetime, only as my colleague Graham noted in his coverage, at that place are major technical hurdles to be overcome before nosotros could transport even a tiny probe to some other star system.  We've got groovy ideas, but information technology's clear that any endeavour to reach fifty-fifty our nearest neighboring star would require some actual engineering development.

NERVA, another next-gen propulsion concept. Image: NASA

NERVA, some other adjacent-gen propulsion concept. Image: NASA

At nowadays, information technology looks like the only candidate for homo-scale exploration of some other star system is nuclear propulsion. No nuclear rocket has ever flown — while we've used nuclear ability on a wide range of satellites and probes, the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963 ended about serious inquiry into using nuclear engines. The thermal nuclear rockets that were congenital and tested in the 1960s through to the present day would exist insufficient to the chore likewise. Nuclear thermal rockets would exist more powerful than their chemical counterparts if used correctly, but not enough to bridge the gap.

Now, it's true that concepts like Project Orion or Projection Dadaelus have the theoretical adequacy to push a spacecraft quickly enough to accelerate information technology to some significant fraction of c. Project Orion was a research project in the 1950s and 1960s that proposed building a infinite vehicle with a large pusher plate at the rear. Shaped nuclear charges would be ejected from the rear of the spacecraft, then detonated, with the resulting shockwave accelerating the ship to college and higher velocities. In 1968 Freeman Dyson estimated that information technology could have between 130 and 133 years to reach Alpha Centauri using these designs; subsequently research indicated that a fission rocket of this sort might accomplish between 9-eleven% the speed of light (height cruising speed is less if you lot intend to boring the ship down with the same kind of explosions as yous arroyo your destination). In theory, such a fission rocket might reach Proxima Centauri inside a homo lifetime, if you await a man lifetime to be nigh double what information technology is. This type of nuclear pulse drive, while functional in theory and buildable with electric current technology, is still strictly theoretical. Later projects, like Projection Daedalus, proposed the utilise of fusion rockets, only no such rocket has yet been congenital.

Fortunately for our scientific ambitions, we'll be able to acquire more virtually Proxima b in the coming years without leaving planet Earth. When the European Extremely Large Telescope comes online in 2024, its 39.3-meter mirror is expected to be capable of studying the temper of exoplanets many low-cal-years abroad. If Proxima b makes the appropriate transits of its parent star, we should exist able to learn a dandy deal about its chemical makeup and temper, if it has one. The James Webb telescope, when it comes online, should shed additional lite (pun intended) on the planet and whether or not it could back up life.